"Descrizione" by Ottika11 (2065 pt) | 2019-Aug-04 10:13 |
Evaluation | N. Experts | Evaluation | N. Experts |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 6 | ||
2 | 7 | ||
3 | 8 | ||
4 | 9 | ||
5 | 10 |
Barley malt is traditionally used in the brewing industry and it is the product of the germination of barley. During germination, the non-starch polysaccharides (NSPs) in the cell wall of barley, constituting mainly arabinoxylans and β-glucans, are solubilised and partly degraded into smaller molecules (1).
Health
Barley and germinated barley contain large quantities of glutamine (2) an important substrate for colonic mucosa. Glutamine is easily degraded by the low pH in the stomach, but some of the glutamine is protected by the dietary fibre during digestion in the stomach (3) and therefore reaches the colon. In this study, starting from the premise that Butyric acid, one of the key products formed when β-glucans are degraded by the microbiota in the colon, has been proposed to be important for colonic health. Glutamine bound to the fibre may have similar effects once it has been liberated from the fibre in the colon. Both β-glucans and glutamine are found in high amounts in malted barley. Lactobacillus rhamnosus together with malt has been shown to increase the formation of butyric acid further in rats (4).
Sugars
The malted grain contains a significantly higher amount of reducing sugars in comparison with the unmalted grain (p < 0.05). The percentage of reducing sugars in total sugars in barley grain of the Karakan variety and in barley malt were 10% and 25%, respectively (5).
Chemical composition
Phenolic acids have been extensively studied in food science research for their antioxidant effect. In this study (6), the genotype difference and the genetic control of phenolic acids and their correlation with malt quality have been studied. Ferulic acid (FA) and p-cumaric acid (p-CA) have been identified as two major phenolic acids, showing wide variations between the 68 barley genotypes. The mean content of FA and p-CA was 2.15 μg g (-1) and 1.10 μg g (-1) in the granules and 4.07 μg g (-1) and 1.44 μg g -1) respectively in barley malt (6).
Mashes
The barley malt is started towards an industrial fermentation process called "mashes". Temperatures range from 50° to 70°.
Components | Content | |
Barley Variety Karakan | Barley Munich Malt Type 2 | |
Moisture (g/kg) | 113.20 ± 3.61b | 43.40 ± 1.42a |
Reducing sugars (g/kg) | 71.70 ± 2.40a | 184.30 ± 8.43b |
Total sugars (g/kg) | 682.71 ± 28.42a | 736.07 ± 25.51a |
Starch (g/kg) | 549.90 ± 17.71a | 496.52 ± 15.20a |
Protein (g/kg d.w.) | 97.04 ± 5.13a | 95.60 ± 3.33a |
Chemical composition of sweet mashes. | ||||||||||
Method of Starch | Source of Amylolytic Enzymes | Extract (g/kg) | pH | Sugars (g/L) | Total Sugars | Acids (g/L) | ||||
Liberation | (Glucose) | |||||||||
Glucose | Maltose | Maltotriose | Dextrins | (g/L) | Lactic Acid | Acetic Acid | ||||
PLS | Barley Munich malt type 2 | 190.64 ± 9.51b | 4.8 ± 0.1a | 4.06 ± 0.14a | 31.26 ± 1.17c | 4.88 ± 0.18a | 91.12 ± 2.83b | 164.70 ± 6.29b | 0.04 ± 0.00a | 0.08 ± 0.00b |
Termamyl S.C. SanExtra | 172.18 ± 7.25a | 4.8 ± 0.1a | 7.64 ± 0.26b | 16.25 ± 0.61b | 20.44 ± 0.72c | 102.84 ± 3.19c | 152.20 ± 3.97a | ND | 0.04 ± 0.00a | |
Pressure-thermal | Barley Munich malt type 2 | 191.19 ± 11.05b | 4.8 ± 0.1a | 10.88 ± 0.37c | 41.23 ± 1.54d | 7.96 ± 0.29b | 66.13 ± 2.05a | 162.70 ± 4.90b | 0.05 ± 0.00a | 0.12 ± 0.00b |
Termamyl S.C. SanExtra | 175.89 ± 10.08a | 4.8 ± 0.1a | 35.14 ± 1.20d | 9.68 ± 0.31a | 21.22 ± 0.76c | 87.18 ± 2.82b | 150.40 ± 3.69a | ND | 0.16 ± 0.00c |
Chemical composition of fermented mashes. | |||||||||||
Method of Starch Liberation | Source of Amylolytic Enzymes/Addition of Hop α-Acids | Extract | pH | Sugars (g/L) | Total Sugars (Glucose) | Acids (g/L) | Ethyl | ||||
(+ or − *) | (g/kg) | (g/L) | Alcohol | ||||||||
Glucose | Maltose | Maltotriose | Dextrins | Lactic Acid | Acetic Acid | (g/L) | |||||
PLS | Barley Munich malt type 2/− | 42.10 ± 1.25f | 3.4 ± 0.0a | 0.62 ± 0.02f | 3.20 ± 0.12c | 12.17 ± 0.44e | 5.49 ± 0.17b | 28.80 ± 0.49ef | 7.10 ± 0.21d | 0.62 ± 0.01e | 53.30 ± 1.82a |
Barley Munich malt type 2/+ | 29.41 ± 1.09d | 4.1 ± 0.1d | 0.42 ± 0.01e | 3.04 ± 0.11c | 4.80 ± 0.18c | 2.97 ± 0.09a | 9.50 ± 0.36b | 0.26 ± 0.01ab | 0.22 ± 0.01bc | 66.40 ± 2.43d | |
Termamyl S.C. SanExtra/− | 34.64 ± 1.12e | 3.5 ± 0.1a | 0.04 ± 0.00a | 0.38 ± 0.01b | 1.00 ± 0.04b | 9.48 ± 0.29d | 21.30 ± 0.31cd | 0.43 ± 0.01b | 0.24 ± 0.01c | 59.18 ± 2.19bc | |
Termamyl S.C. SanExtra/+ | 31.05 ± 0.97d | 3.6 ± 0.1a | 0.04 ± 0.00a | 0.40 ± 0.01b | 0.96 ± 0.03b | 9.99 ± 0.31d | 12.10 ± 0.46de | 0.19 ± 0.01ab | 0.18 ± 0.00b | 63.28 ± 2.36c | |
Pressure-thermal | Barley Munich malt type 2/− | 22.34 ± 0.86c | 3.3 ± 0.1a | 0.08 ± 0.00b | 0.18 ± 0.01a | 6.34 ± 0.23d | 11.95 ± 0.37e | 17.30 ± 0.52e | 9.58 ± 0.25e | 1.72 ± 0.05f | 57.72 ± 1.63ab |
Barley Munich malt type 2/+ | 14.16 ± 0.54b | 3.9 ± 0.1c | 0.09 ± 0.00b | 0.16 ± 0.01a | 5.10 ± 0.18c | 6.49 ± 0.20c | 7.60 ± 0.25a | 1.56 ± 0.05c | 0.34 ± 0.01d | 66.60 ± 2.94d | |
Termamyl S.C. SanExtra/− | 23.52 ± 1.04c | 3.7 ± 0.1bc | 0.24 ± 0.01d | 0.16 ± 0.01a | 0.28 ± 0.01a | 14.54 ± 0.45e | 16.70 ± 0.41c | 0.16 ± 0.00ab | 0.19 ± 0.01bc | 59.26 ± 2.53bc | |
Termamyl S.C. SanExtra/+ | 12.37 ± 0.75a | 3.8 ± 0.1bc | 0.19 ± 0.01c | 0.12 ± 0.00a | 0.22 ± 0.01a | 5.83 ± 0.18bc | 6.90 ± 0.22a | 0.04 ± 0.00a | 0.12 ± 0.00a | 66.71 ± 2.27d |
References_________________________________________________________
(1) Jamar C, Jardin Pd, Fauconnier M. Cell wall polysaccharides hydrolysis of malting barley (Hordeum vulgare L.): a review. Biotechnol Agron Soc Environ. 2011;15:301–13
(2) Robertson JA, I'Anson KJA, Treimo J, Faulds CB, Brocklehurst TF, Eijsink VGH, et al. Profiling brewers’ spent grain for composition and microbial ecology at the site of production. LWT Food Sci Technol. 2010;43:890–6
(3) Protein, and dietary fiber-rich new foodstuff from brewer's spent grain increased excretion of feces and jejunum mucosal protein content in rats. Kanauchi O, Agata K Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 1997 Jan; 61(1):29-33.
(4) Prebiotic and synbiotic effects on rats fed malted barley with selected bacteria strains. Zhong Y, Nyman M. Food Nutr Res. 2014 Oct 6;58. doi: 10.3402/fnr.v58.24848.
(5) The Effect of Different Starch Liberation and Saccharification Methods on the Microbial Contaminations of Distillery Mashes, Fermentation Efficiency, and Spirits Quality. Pielech-Przybylska K, Balcerek M, Nowak A, Wojtczak M, Czyżowska A, Dziekońska-Kubczak U, Patelski P. Molecules. 2017 Sep 30;22(10). pii: E1647. doi: 10.3390/molecules22101647.
(6) Genetic Diversity of Individual Phenolic Acids in Barley and Their Correlation with Barley Malt Quality. Cai S, Han Z, Huang Y, Chen ZH, Zhang G, Dai F. J Agric Food Chem. 2015 Aug 12;63(31):7051-7. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.5b02960.
Evaluate |