Check the ingredients!
... live healthy!
|
|
|
|
| Donate | App | Join | Log in |
|
|
|
|
|
| Donate | App | Join | Log in |
 | "Descrizione" by Frank123 (12004 pt) | 2024-Oct-06 16:09 |
| Evaluation | N. Experts | Evaluation | N. Experts |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | ||
| 2 | 7 | ||
| 3 | 8 | ||
| 4 | 9 | ||
| 5 | 10 |
Iron oxide and hydroxide are chemicals of various colors used as food additives in the food industry and are labeled with the number E172 as food additives and as CI 77499 as colorants.
The complete table includes:
Typical characteristics of commercial dyes:
Item | Red | Yellow | Black | Green | Orange | Blue | Brown |
Content % | ≥96 | ≥86 | ≥90 | ≥88 | ≥88 | ||
Oil absorption ml/100g | 15-25 | 25-35 | 15-25 | 25-35 | 20-30 | 25-35 | 20-30 |
Res.on 325 mesh % | ≤0.3 | ≤0.3 | ≤0.5 | ≤0.3 | ≤0.3 | ≤0.3 | ≤0.3 |
Water soluble salts % | ≤0.3 | ≤0.3 | ≤0.5 | ≤0.3 | ≤0.3 | ≤2.5 | ≤0.5 |
Moisture % | ≤1.0 | ≤1.0 | ≤1.0 | ≤1.0 | ≤1.0 | ≤1.0 | ≤1.0 |
PH value | 3-7 | 3-7 | 5-8 | 6-9 | 3-7 | ≥6.0 | 4-7 |
Tamped apparent density g/cm3 | 0.7-1.1 | 0.4-0.6 | 0.8-1.2 | 0.4-0.8 | 0.4-0.6 | 0.4-0.8 | 0.8-1.2 |
Particle Shape | Spherical | Acicular | Spherical | Irregular | Irregular | Irregular | Irregular |
Dye Strength % | 95~105 | 95~105 | 95~105 | 95~105 | 95~105 | 95~105 | 95~105 |
Dye Difference △E | ≤1.0 | ≤1.0 | ≤1.0 | ≤1.0 | ≤1.0 | ≤1.0 | ≤1.0 |
Industrial surface treatments:
Applications.
Cosmetics, construction, paints, detergents, waterproof flooring, ceramics, PVC, plastics, glues, pharmaceuticals, medicine.
Black Iron Oxide is an insoluble powder but miscible in oils and water. It has high covering power and high tinting strength. It is easily dispersible, shows excellent light fastness and resistance to external weathering. Non-toxic, non-irritating.
Ultraviolet rays from the sun cause skin aging and smartphones emit high-energy visible light from which you should protect yourself. Iron oxides (yellow, red and black) in sunscreens have the property of effectively blocking high-energy visible light especially when combined with zinc oxide (1).
Safety
The Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food provides a scientific opinion re‐evaluating the safety of iron oxides and hydroxides used as food additives (E 172): yellow iron oxide (FeO(OH)·H2O), red iron oxide (Fe2O3) and black iron oxide (FeO·Fe2O3). (2).
Cosmetic safety
Restricted cosmetic ingredient as IV/137 a Relevant Item in the Annexes of the European Cosmetics Regulation 1223/2009. Substance or ingredient reported: Iron Oxide Black. Purity criteria as set out in Commission Directive 95/45/EC (E172)
 |  |
 |  |
Synonyms:
References____________________________________________________________________
(1) Bernstein EF, Sarkas HW, Boland P. Iron oxides in novel skin care formulations attenuate blue light for enhanced protection against skin damage. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2021 Feb;20(2):532-537. doi: 10.1111/jocd.13803.
(2) EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS)
First published: 08 December 2015 https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4317
Abstract. Brown Iron Oxide has been included in this assessment for completeness, due to its importance as a commercial blend. The Panel considered that the particle size and particle size distribution should be included in the specifications. In 1980, an ADI of 0‐0.5 mg/kg bw/day was established by JECFA. Absorption of iron from iron oxides is low. The acute oral toxicity of iron oxides is greater than 10 g iron oxide/kg bw. From a subacute and a subchronic toxicity study, the Panel identified a NOAEL for red iron oxide of 1 000 mg/kg bw/day, the highest dose tested. Red (Fe2O3) and black (FeO·Fe2O3) iron oxide, both in nano‐ and micro‐form, were positive in in vitro genotoxicity assays in mammalian cells. Due to the limitations of the database, and considering the impossibility to read‐across between iron oxides with different redox state, the Panel considered that the genotoxicity of iron oxides cannot be evaluated based on the available data. Concerning carcinogenicity and reproductive and developmental toxicity, no signs of toxicity were observed in unpublished studies which were not available and could not be evaluated by the Panel. The Panel concluded that an adequate assessment of the safety of E 172 could not be carried out because a sufficient biological and toxicological database was not available. Refined exposure estimates show that exposure to E 172 ranged from 0.03 mg/kg bw/day for infants to 3.7 mg/kg bw/day for toddlers at the mean and from 0.1 mg/kg bw/day for infants to 9.5 mg/kg bw/day for toddlers at the 95th percentile for the non‐brand‐loyal scenario
| Evaluate |
